Skip to main content

The inherent flaw of Smartphone Cameras

Quality of the builtin camera has become a key selling point for smartphones these days. Samsung Galaxy K Zoom has gone to such extremes that they put a zoom lens on the phone blurring the lines of a standalone cam and camera phone. There are many who doesn’t want to buy the HTC one only because it has a 4mp cam. There are even people who bought the Nokia pureview lineup just for the camera. Today we are going to discuss an old camera tech that could sort out the low light photography problem  current phones face without adding any expensive image stabilization or even compromises on resolution.




Before explaining the tech itself, first let’s learn how an image sensor captures a picture. Image sensor is a matrix of photodiodes which can just measure the intensity of light falling on it. Which means it can only generate a black and white picture. To get a colour image, we die the individual photo diodes with a primary colour. There are several layouts in which the dies are arranged. The most common is Bayer pattern.



Here a red coloured photo diode measures the intensity of red light and the green measures green and blue does blue. The output from all 4 pixels is used to fix the colour of one pixel in the final picture. This process is called demosaicing. Two green colour pixels  are used because human eyes are more sensitive to the colour green. The problem with this pattern is, a primary coloured die allows the passage of the light of its own colour and absorbs the other two primary colours .
Let us assume that the incident colour has equal amounts of red, blue and green. Red die allows just 1/3rd of the light to pass through it. Other portion is just wasted. 2/3rd loss is a big number because the size of the individual photo diode is very small and every bit of light is important. (HTC chose 4mp resolution to increase the size of individual pixels without changing the overall size of the sensor.)

In the initial stages of digital photography, there was another pattern, it used cyan, yellow, green and magenta giving a CYGM pattern.The benefit of the layout is that the dies are secondary colours, they block only one primary colour, means they allow 2/3rd of the incident light energy to pass through to the sensor. Only 1/3rd of the light is absorbed. The increased sensitivity would allow even better low light photos without that much of physical change. If price is not barrier, we can further improve the pattern  by adding an image stabilisation and adding another white pixel like in the Motorola X ClearPixel.
File:CYGM pattern.svg

             The concept is pretty simple, yet the reason the technology was forgotten is because of the way things work in an industry. Almost everyone used the bayer pattern and hence big money and research was spent on optimising demosaicing and colour correction algorithms for that particullar pattern. No companies wanted to use a technology that was not actively developed. This is very similar to the app dilemma new mobile OS’ face. (people wont buy a phone without apps, app developers wont make apps on a platform that doesn’t have enough users.)

Now with the recent advancements in image processing chips and more advanced algorithms, I think we can give a second chance to this long forgotten design. I wish I could see a pureview phone soon with CYGM pattern. Hope you enjoyed reading. Share your thoughts at the comment section below.

You can share this article with the buttons placed at the bottom left

Comments

  1. CYGM gives better luminance,but at the expence of colour accuracy...CCDs are better, i believe...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Even bayer pattern sensors have color accuracy issues in the output from sensor. It is the image processing unit that sorts out the colour problem. With enough work put into the algorithms, the colour accuracy problem can be sorted out.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Secret sauce behind the success of Moto’s revival (It’s not what you think)

                  The turnaround of Motorola from a money bleeding failed phone maker to a company which now owns six percentage of Europe’s total phone sales last year is nothing short of an unbelievable feat. Everyone from the average Joe to the think tanks behind mega corporate are smoking their heads thinking how they did this. There is no simple answer to this question. Like any other success stories, Motorola is hesitant to tell their secrets. But it’s just a matter of time before someone connects the dots and finds out that. Now let me connect the dots for you. Googliness.. It all started from Google buying the failing brand. A decision which gave Google lot of pressure from the OEM’s who was licensing its mobile OS, android, and ultimately led to the selling of Motorola to Lenovo. (I will write an article on that later). The move made Google directly competing with its previous pa...

Nokia X2 the real Moto E killer

                                     Moto E is now “The budget smartphone” every other manufacturer is trying to outdo. Everyone has a different approach. Some merely try to match the spec list on paper. Some try to improve the parts Motorola left out. Nokia is the latest to test their luck on this. Before going deep into Nokia X2 , let us look at some of the competitors in india. Lava iris X1           Very good looking. Solid camera with dual flash. But the SOC is a letdown. Anyone who have used the overpriced Samsung grand and the s duos with the broadcomm chips will know what I mean. These chips use subpar videocore gpu’s that are very buggy and even incompatible with some apps. These chips may be the choice for the raspberry p revolution, but its not enough for running android smoothly. Micromax unite 2   ...

Why you are paying a premium for Apple iPhone

                                  Before even beginning, there is one thing that I need to make clear. I personally use an android phone and am someone who really enjoys the freedom of android platform to its fullest. Still I think the high price tag apple demands is justifiable. The latest addition to the iPhone line up, iPhone 6 will also follow the tradition of bearing a steep sticker price off contract . But what exactly is the reason behind this? Is apple charging a fortune just to tap into the human mindset that “anything expensive = top quality” without delivering? Let us analyse the facts Number game            Think about it, android is shipped in millions of devices made by an army of OEMs on an everyday basis. Whereas IOS is available only on Apple devices. Still it’s Apple products that brings out a trend that everyone else follows...